Taxontips
No Result
View All Result
Sunday, June 8, 2025
Login/ Register
  • Home
  • Income Tax
    • Income Tax Return
    • Tax Notice/ Personal consultation
    • Compliance Notice
    • Faceless Assessment
  • GST
    • GST Registration
    • GST Consultation
  • News
    • Income Tax News
    • GST news
    • Budget News
    • Business & Other News
  • Q & A
  • About us
  • Contact us
Talk to an Expert
  • Home
  • Income Tax
    • Income Tax Return
    • Tax Notice/ Personal consultation
    • Compliance Notice
    • Faceless Assessment
  • GST
    • GST Registration
    • GST Consultation
  • News
    • Income Tax News
    • GST news
    • Budget News
    • Business & Other News
  • Q & A
  • About us
  • Contact us
No Result
View All Result
Taxontips
No Result
View All Result

Investment by Foreign companies in Indian companies cannot be considered as undisclosed income of foreign companies [Read order]

Income tax Expert by Income tax Expert
January 16, 2024
in Case Laws, Income Tax News
0
GSTR 3B can now be recitified – Landmark Judgement by Delhi High court
96
SHARES
1.2k
VIEWS
image_pdfPDFimage_printPrint

The above judgement has been passed by Hon’ble Delhi High Court in case of M/S ANGELANTONI TEST TECHNOLOGIES SRL V/s ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE INT TAX 1(1)(1) & ORS. and various other cases. Order was Dt. 19.12.2023.

 

Summary of judgement: Although after the amendment in Section 148 w.e.f. 01.04.2001, assessment can be reopened based on information and it is not necessary to form reason to believe, however still the basic requirement while reopening the assessment is that there should be an income escaping assessment.

An investment made by a foreign company in an Indian company is a capital account transaction and such transaction cannot lead to the generating income of such foreign company.

 

Full judgement is as under:

 

1. Present writ petitions have been filed seeking quashing of the impugned notices issued under Section 148A (b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the “Act”), impugned orders passed under Section 148A(d) of the Act, and notices issued under Section 148 of the Act, and all consequential actions thereto. Petitioners also challenge the legality and constitutional validity of Explanation 1 to Section 148 of the Act.

 

2. Though a common question of law arises in the present batch of matters, yet facts of each case differ slightly. Just to give a glimpse of the factual scenario, the background facts of M/s Angelantoni Test Technologies SRL Versus Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle Int Tax 1(1)(1) & Ors. being W.P.(C) 15928/2023 are mentioned, namely, that the petitioner is a foreign company and is a resident of Italy. Learned counsel for petitioner states that during FY 2018-19, the petitioner had subscribed to 15,00,000 shares at face value of Rs. 10 each by making foreign inward remittance of Rs. 1,50,00,000 in its wholly owned Indian subsidiary namely, Angelantoni Test Technologies India Pvt. Ltd. in accordance with applicable regulations. He further states that since the Petitioner had not earned any income from any source in India, the Petitioner did not file return of income in India.

 

3. Learned counsel for the Petitioners submit that the transactions in question are capital account transactions which are incapable of generating any income. They contend that the impugned orders and notices have be passed merely to verify the transactions without any tangible material in possession of the Respondent to indicate escapement of income. They further state that there is no information/ material including the name of the company whose shares were purchased, referred to or relied upon in the impugned notice, which could trigger “suspicion’ of escapement of income chargeable to tax. In fact, the common argument in the present batch of matters is that investment of shares of another entity cannot be construed as income which is chargeable to tax and/or has escaped assessment.

 

4. Learned counsel for the respondents-revenue state that notices under Section 148A(b) had been issued in the present batch of matters in accordance with the Risk Management Strategy formulated by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (“CBDT”) in terms of Explanation 1 to Section 148 of the Act.

 

5. The admitted facts in the present batch of matters are that the assessees are foreign companies who have made remittances/investment in shares of their Indian subsidiaries. It is an admitted position that the transactions in question are capital account transactions. Though there is a doubt expressed that the transactions in question may be a consequence of round tripping, yet no evidence or proof of the said allegations have been stated or annexed with the impugned orders and notices.

 

6. It is settled law that investment in shares in an Indian subsidiary cannot be treated as ‘income’ as the same is in the nature of “capital account transaction” not giving rise to any income. In Nestle SA Versus Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (W.P.(C) No. 12643/2018), this Court held that the allegation of the Revenue that the investment in the shares of Indian subsidiary amounted to ‘income’ is flawed. The relevant portion of the said judgment is reproduced hereinunder:

“24. The principal objection of the Petitioner that its investment in the shares of its subsidiary cannot be treated as ‘income’ is well founded. The decision of the Bombay High Court in Vodafone India Services Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India (supra) holding such investment in shares to be a ‘capital account transaction’ not giving rise to income was accepted by the CBDT. Para 2 of Instruction No.2 of 2015 dated 29th January, 2015 reads thus:

“2. It is hereby informed that the Board has accepted the decision of the High Court of Bombay in the above mentioned Writ Petition. In view of the acceptance of the above judgment, it is directed that the ratio decidendi of the judgment must be adhered to by the field officers in all cases where this issue is involved. This may also be brought to the notice of the ITAT, DRPs and CIT (Appeals).”

25. Therefore, the fundamental premise of the Respondent that the above investment by the Petitioner in the shares of its subsidiary amounted to ‘income’ which had escaped assessment was flawed. The question of such a transaction forming a live link for reasons to believe that income had escaped assessment is entirely without basis and is rejected as such.”

 

7. Further, the action of the Respondents is in contravention of the CBDT Instruction No. 2 of 2015 dated 29th January, 2015 reiterating the view expressed by the Bombay High Court in Vodafone India Services Pvt. Ltd. Versus Union of India ((2014) 368 ITR 1 (Bom)) that no income arises on investment in shares since it is a capital account transaction.

 

8. In fact, the judgment of the Bombay High Court was accepted by the Union Cabinet and a press note dated 28th January, 2015 was issued by the Press Information Bureau, Government of India. The relevant portion of the said press note is reproduced hereinbelow:

“Acceptance of the Order of the High Court of Bombay in the case of Vodafone India Services Private Limited

The Union Cabinet, chaired by the Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi, in a major decision, has decided to accept the order of the High Court of Bombay in the case of Vodafone India Services Private Limited (VISPL) dated 10.10.2014. This is a major correction of a tax matter which has adversely affected investor sentiment. Based on the opinion of Chief Commissioner of Income-tax (International Taxation), Chairperson (CBDT) and the Attorney General of India, the Cabinet decided to:

i. accept the order of the High Court of Bombay in WP No. 871 of 2014, dated 10.10.2014; and not to file SLP against it before the Supreme Court of India;

ii. accept of orders of Courts/ IT AT/ DRP in cases of other taxpayers where similar transfer pricing adjustments have been made and the Courts/ IT AT/ DRP have decided/decide in favour of the taxpayer.

The Cabinet decision will bring greater clarity and predictability for taxpayers as well as tax authorities, thereby facilitating tax compliance and reducing litigation on similar issues. This will also set at rest the uncertainty prevailing in the minds of foreign investors and taxpayers in respect of possible transfer pricing adjustments in India on transactions related to issuance of shares, and thereby improve the investment climate in the country.

The Cabinet came to this view as this is a transaction on the capital account and there is no income to be chargeable to tax. So applying any pricing formula is irrelevant.
xxx xxx xxx

VISPL filed a 2nd Writ Petition in the High Court of Bombay. The High Court, on 10.10.2014, has amongst other things observed:
xxx xxx xxx

e) The issue of shares at a premium is on Capital account and gives rise to no income. The submission on behalf of the revenue that the shortfall in the ALP as computed for the purposes of Chapter X of the Act is misplaced. The ALP is meant to determine the real value of the transaction entered into between AEs. It is a re-computation exercise to be carried out only when income arises in case of an International transaction between AEs. It does not warrant re-computation of a consideration received / given on capital account.”

 

9. Further, this Court in Divya Capital One Private Limited (Earlier Known as Divya Portfolio Private Limited) vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 7(1) Delhi & Anr., 2022 SCC OnLine Del 1461 held that ‘Whether it is “information to suggest” under amended law or “reason to believe” under erstwhile law the benchmark of “escapement of income chargeable of tax” still remains the primary condition to be satisfied before invoking powers under Section 147 of the Act’.

 

10. Consequently, the impugned orders under Section 148A (d) of the Act and the notices passed under Section 148 of the Act and all consequential action taken thereto are set aside. It is clarified that if any material becomes subsequently available with the Revenue, it shall be open to it to take proceedings in accordance with law. The challenge to the vires to Explanation 1 to Section 148 of the Act is left open.

With the aforesaid directions, the present batch of writ petitions is disposed of.

 

To read full judgement CLICK ME.

 

You can book phone consultation/ assistance online with expert as mentioned below:

To book ITR filing with experts CLICK ME.

To book phone consultation with experts for any Income tax related matters CLICK ME.

To book consultation for Faceless Assessment with experts CLICK ME.

To book phone consultation with experts for GST related matters CLICK ME.

To book general phone consultation with expert CLICK ME.

 

Connect with us on: LinkedIn, Telegram, Instagram, Facebook, Twitter and Youtube for regular Updates.

image_pdfPDFimage_printPrint
Tags: delhi high court judgementHigh court judgementincome tax case lawIncome tax updateslatest income tax judgementtaxontips
Previous Post

No deduction of expenses under Income tax Act if payment is not made till 31st March: 43B amendment [MSME]

Next Post

GST department has issued advisory on: Introduction of New 14 and 15 tables in GSTR 1

Related Posts

Tatva Chintan Pharma Chem Limited IPO details and capital gain tax on selling IPO allotment | Capital gain on IPO
Case Laws

ITAT Mumbai: Capital Gains on Indian Mutual Funds Not Taxable in India for Non-Residents under DTAA [Case law]

May 2, 2025
Guidelines for manual selection of returns for Complete Scrutiny during the financial-year 2019-20-
Income Tax News

No relief under section 87A for capital gain even after date extended to file revised return for AY 2024-25?

April 1, 2025
Received mail from GSTN “Aggregate turnover being more than Rs. 5 Cr during FY 2019-20” What does this mean?
Income Tax News

Assessee receiving message for 80GGC donation for AY 2022-23 from Income tax department

January 29, 2025
Guidelines for manual selection of returns for Complete Scrutiny during the financial-year 2019-20-
Income Tax News

Guidance note 2 issued for Vivad se vishwas Scheme, 2024 [Read circular]

January 1, 2025
Guidelines for manual selection of returns for Complete Scrutiny during the financial-year 2019-20-
Income Tax News

Due date extended for filing belated, revised return and Vivad se vishwas declaration

December 31, 2024
Due date for Tax audit for A.Y. 2019-20 extended from 30th September to 31st October
Income Tax News

Extension of due date for furnishing return of income from 30.11.2024 to 15.12.2024

November 30, 2024
Next Post
Data of GST website under comparison of liability declared and ITC claimed tab not available

GST department has issued advisory on: Introduction of New 14 and 15 tables in GSTR 1

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Google Custom search

Recent Posts

  • Statutory Compliance Calendar for June 2025 | Income tax, GST and various other laws
  • Statutory Compliance Calendar for May 2025 | Income tax, GST and various other laws
  • ITAT Mumbai: Capital Gains on Indian Mutual Funds Not Taxable in India for Non-Residents under DTAA [Case law]
  • Statutory Compliance Calendar for April 2025 | Income tax, GST and various other laws
  • No relief under section 87A for capital gain even after date extended to file revised return for AY 2024-25?

Recent Comments

  • k.salam on Statutory Compliance Calendar for May 2025 | Income tax, GST and various other laws
  • Brendan Gleeson on Clarification for the purposes of Section 269ST of the I.T. Act in respect of dealership/distributorship contract in case of Co-operative Societies
  • Kovac Ryker on Clarification for the purposes of Section 269ST of the I.T. Act in respect of dealership/distributorship contract in case of Co-operative Societies
  • Hailey Bradwell on Clarification for the purposes of Section 269ST of the I.T. Act in respect of dealership/distributorship contract in case of Co-operative Societies
  • ADMIN on Submit response to confirm/ revise the refund claim – Why are you getting this mail and how to get refund

Categories

  • Budget News
  • Business & Other News
  • Case Laws
  • GST news
  • Income Tax News
  • News

Browse Topics by Date

June 2025
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30  
« May    
  • GSTR 9/ 9C extended : AGAIN

    GSTR 9/ 9C due date to be extended to 31.10.2020 | E-invoicing will be voluntary in the beginning

    6537 shares
    Share 2615 Tweet 1634
  • How to pay Membership and COP fees of ICAI for 2020-21 |

    6444 shares
    Share 2578 Tweet 1611
  • Code/ Nature of payment 6CR updated by NSDL in challan 281 for paying TCS on sale of goods

    5904 shares
    Share 2362 Tweet 1476
  • Are all the due dates of tax audit and Income tax return for FY 2019-20 extended to 31.03.2021 by the bill presented in Lok sabha Dt. 18.09.2020

    4855 shares
    Share 1942 Tweet 1214
  • SFT transaction mentioned in Form 26AS | What does it mean? | Who reports it? | SFT codes transaction type

    4083 shares
    Share 1633 Tweet 1021

Recent Notification

Compliance due dates for June, 2020 | Compliance calendar for June, 2020 | 20+ compliances

Statutory Compliance Calendar for June 2025 | Income tax, GST and various other laws

June 5, 2025
Compliance due dates for June, 2020 | Compliance calendar for June, 2020 | 20+ compliances

Statutory Compliance Calendar for May 2025 | Income tax, GST and various other laws

May 8, 2025

RSS Taxontips

  • Statutory Compliance Calendar for June 2025 | Income tax, GST and various other laws
  • Statutory Compliance Calendar for May 2025 | Income tax, GST and various other laws
  • ITAT Mumbai: Capital Gains on Indian Mutual Funds Not Taxable in India for Non-Residents under DTAA [Case law]
  • Statutory Compliance Calendar for April 2025 | Income tax, GST and various other laws
  • No relief under section 87A for capital gain even after date extended to file revised return for AY 2024-25?
  • Statutory Audit of Cash and Cash Equivalents in Indian Companies [Company Law]
  • Statutory Audit of Trade Receivables in Indian Companies [Company law]
  • Statutory Compliance Calendar for February 2025 | Income tax, GST and various other laws
  • Budget 2025 updates | Income tax and GST updates
  • Assessee receiving message for 80GGC donation for AY 2022-23 from Income tax department

Categories

  • Budget News
  • Business & Other News
  • Case Laws
  • GST news
  • Income Tax News
  • News

Site menu

  • Home
  • Income Tax
    • Income Tax Return
    • Tax Notice/ Personal consultation
    • Compliance Notice
    • Faceless Assessment
  • GST
    • GST Registration
    • GST Consultation
  • News
    • Income Tax News
    • GST news
    • Budget News
    • Business & Other News
  • Q & A
  • About us
  • Contact us
Taxontips

TaxOnTips provides you all tax related solutions in easy way and update you with its regular updates & notifications Visit us for details.
We are based in Jaipur, India

© 2019-2023 Taxontips.com - Tax assistance at your Fingertips

No Result
View All Result
  • Login/Signup
  • Income Tax
    • Income Tax Return
    • Tax Notice/ Personal consultation
    • Compliance Notice
    • Faceless Assessment
  • GST
    • GST registration
    • GST Consultation
  • News
    • Income Tax News
    • GST news
    • Budget News
    • Business & Other News
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Ask an expert/ Talk to an expert
  • Q & A
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use

© 2019-2023 Taxontips.com - Tax assistance at your Fingertips

Book Phone consultation with expert

Sitting home or at your office and don't have time to visit CA's office or don't know where to consult CA. Book your consultation with an expert practicing Chartered Accountant and get your query solved.

Book a phone consultation for 30 minutes with our expert at a very basic cost.

Book consultation

No thanks, I'm not interested!