Taxontips
No Result
View All Result
Sunday, June 8, 2025
Login/ Register
  • Home
  • Income Tax
    • Income Tax Return
    • Tax Notice/ Personal consultation
    • Compliance Notice
    • Faceless Assessment
  • GST
    • GST Registration
    • GST Consultation
  • News
    • Income Tax News
    • GST news
    • Budget News
    • Business & Other News
  • Q & A
  • About us
  • Contact us
Talk to an Expert
  • Home
  • Income Tax
    • Income Tax Return
    • Tax Notice/ Personal consultation
    • Compliance Notice
    • Faceless Assessment
  • GST
    • GST Registration
    • GST Consultation
  • News
    • Income Tax News
    • GST news
    • Budget News
    • Business & Other News
  • Q & A
  • About us
  • Contact us
No Result
View All Result
Taxontips
No Result
View All Result

No new loss can be claimed in revised return which was not claimed in original return – Supreme Court

Income tax Expert by Income tax Expert
August 15, 2022
in Case Laws, Income Tax News
0
Supreme Court up-helds judgement of Rajasthan High court for extension of due date for GSTR 9/ 9C
114
SHARES
1.4k
VIEWS
image_pdfPDFimage_printPrint

The above judgement was passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-III, Bangalore and another Versus M/s Wipro Limited (CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1449 OF 2022 Dt. 11.07.2022).

 

In the judgement it was held by Hon’ble Supreme court that the exemptions once claimed u/s 10B of the Income Tax Act cannot be withdrawn in revised return and thus the loss not claimed in original return cannot be claimed now.

 

Facts of the case:

The respondent-assessee is a 100% export-oriented unit and engaged in the business of running a call centre and IT Enabled and Remote Processing Services. Assessee filed its return of income on 31.10.2001 for Assessment Year 2001-2002, declaring loss of Rs.15,47,76,990/- and claimed exemption under Section 10B of the IT Act. Along with the original return filed on 31.10.2001, the assessee annexed a note to the computation of income in which the assessee clearly stated that the company is a 100% export-oriented unit and entitled to claim exemption under Section 10B of the IT Act and therefore no loss is being carried forward. That thereafter, the assessee filed a declaration dated 24.10.2002 before the Assessing Officer (AO) stating that the assessee does not want to avail the benefit under Section 10B of the IT Act for A.Y. 2001-02 as per Section 10B (8) of the IT Act. The assessee filed the revised return of income on 23.12.2002 wherein exemption under Section 10B of the IT Act was not claimed and the assessee claimed carry forward of losses.

 

Assessing Officer passed an order dated 31.03.2004 rejecting the withdrawal of exemption under Section 10B of the IT Act holding that the assessee did not furnish the declaration in writing before the due date of filing of return of income, which was 31.10.2001. Thereby, the AO made the addition in respect of denial of claim of carrying forward of losses under Section 72 of the IT Act.

 

Revenue’s contention:

Shri Balbir Singh, learned ASG appearing on behalf of the Revenue further submitted that in the present case the assessee filed the revised return of income on 23.12.2002, wherein for the first time the assessee did not claim the exemption under Section 10B of the IT Act and claimed carrying forward of losses under Section 72 of the IT Act. That such a claim could not have been made while submitting the revised return of income. That the revised return of income can be filed under Section 139(5) of the IT Act only to remove the omission and mistake and/or correct the arithmetical error. It is submitted that the revised return of income under Section 139(5) of the IT Act cannot be filed for altogether a new claim. Reliance is placed on the decision of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax v. Andhra Cotton Mills Limited, [1996] 219 ITR 404 (AP).

 

That Section 10B of the IT Act is an exemption provision and the condition for seeking an exemption is required to be complied with strictly with the provision.

 

Assessee’s contention:

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the assessee has submitted that the only question of law which arises in the present case is with regard to the interpretation of Section 10B (8) of the IT Act, viz., whether the requirement of submission of the declaration before the last date for submission of the return is mandatory or directory. It is submitted that on a true interpretation of Sections 10B (5) and 10B (8) of the IT Act, the High Court has rightly observed and held that the requirement of filing a declaration is mandatory in nature, while the time limit in filing the declaration is directory in nature. It is submitted that the High Court has rightly held the requirement of filing the declaration by the time limit directory as non-filing of the declaration within the time limit does not envisage any consequence. It is urged that the High Court has rightly relied upon the decision of the Delhi High Court in the case of Moser Baer decided on 14.05.2008 in ITA No. 950/2007. It is submitted that the issues of validity of the revised return of income; whether the respondent was entitled to carry forward its losses under Sections 10B and 80 of the IT Act; and whether the assessee had duly complied with Section 80 and Section 10B(5) of the IT Act were not raised before the High Court.

 

It is submitted that in the instant case the assessee filed the original return in time declaring the loss and thereby complied with Section 80 of the IT Act.

 

It is submitted that in each of the cases, it is held that the requirement of submission of the document is mandatory, but the stipulation that it should be filed along with the return of income is only directory. Shri Ganesh, learned counsel has referred to the following decisions:
i) Moser Baer (supra);
ii) Rana Polycot Ltd. (supra);
iii) G.M. Knitting Industries Pvt. Ltd. (supra);
iv) CIT v. Panama Chemical Works, 2006 SCC OnLine MP 704;
v) CIT v. Punjab Financial Corp. ILR 2002 (1) P&H 438;
vi) CIT v. Hardeodas Aggarwala Trust; 1991 SCC OnLine Cal.414;
vii) CIT v. Gupta Fabs, 2005 SCC OnLine P&H 1315;
viii) Murali Export House v. CIT, 1995 SCC OnLine Cal. 286;
ix) CIT v. Berger Paints India Ltd., 2002 SCC OnLine Cal. 869; and
x) CIT v. Ramani Relators (P) Ltd., 2014 SCC OnLine Mad. 12717.

 

Judgement:

The short question which is posed for consideration of this Court is, whether, for claiming exemption under Section 10B (8) of the IT Act, the assessee is required to fulfil the twin conditions, namely, (i) furnishing a declaration to the assessing officer in writing that the provisions of Section 10B (8) may not be made applicable to him; and (ii) the said declaration to be furnished before the due date of filing the return of income under sub-section (1) of Section 139 of the IT Act.

In the present case, the High Court as well as the ITAT have observed and held that for claiming the so-called exemption relief under Section 10B (8) of the IT Act, furnishing the declaration to the assessing officer is mandatory but furnishing the same before the due date of filing the original return of income is directory.

 

In the present case, when the assessee submitted its original return of income under Section 139(1) of the IT Act on 31.10.2001, which was the due date for filing of the original return of income, the assessee specifically and clearly stated that it is a company and is a 100% export-oriented unit and entitled to claim exemption under Section 10B of the IT Act and therefore no loss is being carried forward. Along with the original return filed on 31.10.2001, the assessee also annexed a note to the computation of income clearly stating as above. However, thereafter the assessee filed the revised return of income under Section 139(5) of the IT Act on 23.12.2002 and filed a declaration under Section 10B (8) which admittedly was after the due date of filing of the original return under Section 139(1), i.e., 31.10.2001.

In our view, both the conditions to be satisfied are mandatory. It cannot be said that one of the conditions would be mandatory and the other would be directory, where the words used for furnishing the declaration to the assessing officer and to be furnished before the due date of filing the original return of income under sub-section (1) of section 139 are same/similar.

 

Therefore, the Revenue is right in submitting that the revised return filed by the assessee under section 139(5) can only substitute its original return under Section 139(1) and cannot transform it into a return under Section 139(3).

 

The assessee can file a revised return in a case where there is an omission or a wrong statement. But a revised return of income, under Section 139(5) cannot be filed, to withdraw the claim and subsequently claiming the carried forward or set-off of any loss.

By filing the revised return of income, the assessee cannot be permitted to substitute the original return of income filed under section 139(1) of the IT Act.

 

Even the submission on behalf of the assessee that it was not necessary to exercise the option under section 10B (8) of the IT Act and even without filing the revised return of income, the assessee could have submitted the declaration in writing to the assessing officer during the assessment proceedings has no substance and the same cannot be accepted.

In view of the above discussion and for the reasons stated above, we are of the opinion that the High Court has committed a grave error in observing and holding that the requirement of furnishing a declaration under Section 10B (8) of the IT Act is mandatory, but the time limit within which the declaration is to be filed is not mandatory but is directory.

 

To read the full judgement CLICK ME.

 

In our opinion this judgement only talks about not claiming a loss since the assessee cannot withdraw his exemption later. In this judgement no comment has been made that assessee cannot make a fresh claim of deduction in revised return. However, this judgement is being portrayed in a very different manner.

However, the judgement on revised return u/s 139(5) that it can only be used to rectify an omission or wrong statement and cannot substitute the original return is not satisfactory and also not in line with the Landmark judgement of Allahbad High court in case Dhampur Sugar Mills 1973 (90 ITR 236 All) wherein it has been held that:

“It will still retain the character of an original return, but once a revised return is filed, the original return must be taken to have been withdrawn and to have been substituted by a fresh return for the purpose of assessment.”.

 

You can book phone consultation/ assistance online with expert as mentioned below:

To book ITR filing with experts CLICK ME.

To book phone consultation with experts for any Income tax related matters CLICK ME.

To book consultation for Faceless Assessment with experts CLICK ME.

To book phone consultation with experts for GST related matters CLICK ME.

To book general phone consultation with expert CLICK ME.

 

Connect with us on: LinkedIn, Telegram, Instagram, Facebook, Twitter and Youtube for regular Updates.

image_pdfPDFimage_printPrint
Tags: 148 noticeincome tax judgementIncome tax updateslatest income tax judgementlatest supreme court judgementsupreme courtSupreme court judgementsupreme court ordertaxontips
Previous Post

New Functionalities introduced in GST website – July 2022

Next Post

Income Tax Department conducts searches in Jaipur, Rajasthan on a group engaged in the business of gems and jewellery, hospitality and real estate

Related Posts

Tatva Chintan Pharma Chem Limited IPO details and capital gain tax on selling IPO allotment | Capital gain on IPO
Case Laws

ITAT Mumbai: Capital Gains on Indian Mutual Funds Not Taxable in India for Non-Residents under DTAA [Case law]

May 2, 2025
Guidelines for manual selection of returns for Complete Scrutiny during the financial-year 2019-20-
Income Tax News

No relief under section 87A for capital gain even after date extended to file revised return for AY 2024-25?

April 1, 2025
Received mail from GSTN “Aggregate turnover being more than Rs. 5 Cr during FY 2019-20” What does this mean?
Income Tax News

Assessee receiving message for 80GGC donation for AY 2022-23 from Income tax department

January 29, 2025
Guidelines for manual selection of returns for Complete Scrutiny during the financial-year 2019-20-
Income Tax News

Guidance note 2 issued for Vivad se vishwas Scheme, 2024 [Read circular]

January 1, 2025
Guidelines for manual selection of returns for Complete Scrutiny during the financial-year 2019-20-
Income Tax News

Due date extended for filing belated, revised return and Vivad se vishwas declaration

December 31, 2024
Due date for Tax audit for A.Y. 2019-20 extended from 30th September to 31st October
Income Tax News

Extension of due date for furnishing return of income from 30.11.2024 to 15.12.2024

November 30, 2024
Next Post
Income Tax department conducting the biggest raid of 2020 in Raipur!

Income Tax Department conducts searches in Jaipur, Rajasthan on a group engaged in the business of gems and jewellery, hospitality and real estate

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Google Custom search

Recent Posts

  • Statutory Compliance Calendar for June 2025 | Income tax, GST and various other laws
  • Statutory Compliance Calendar for May 2025 | Income tax, GST and various other laws
  • ITAT Mumbai: Capital Gains on Indian Mutual Funds Not Taxable in India for Non-Residents under DTAA [Case law]
  • Statutory Compliance Calendar for April 2025 | Income tax, GST and various other laws
  • No relief under section 87A for capital gain even after date extended to file revised return for AY 2024-25?

Recent Comments

  • k.salam on Statutory Compliance Calendar for May 2025 | Income tax, GST and various other laws
  • Brendan Gleeson on Clarification for the purposes of Section 269ST of the I.T. Act in respect of dealership/distributorship contract in case of Co-operative Societies
  • Kovac Ryker on Clarification for the purposes of Section 269ST of the I.T. Act in respect of dealership/distributorship contract in case of Co-operative Societies
  • Hailey Bradwell on Clarification for the purposes of Section 269ST of the I.T. Act in respect of dealership/distributorship contract in case of Co-operative Societies
  • ADMIN on Submit response to confirm/ revise the refund claim – Why are you getting this mail and how to get refund

Categories

  • Budget News
  • Business & Other News
  • Case Laws
  • GST news
  • Income Tax News
  • News

Browse Topics by Date

June 2025
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30  
« May    
  • GSTR 9/ 9C extended : AGAIN

    GSTR 9/ 9C due date to be extended to 31.10.2020 | E-invoicing will be voluntary in the beginning

    6537 shares
    Share 2615 Tweet 1634
  • How to pay Membership and COP fees of ICAI for 2020-21 |

    6444 shares
    Share 2578 Tweet 1611
  • Code/ Nature of payment 6CR updated by NSDL in challan 281 for paying TCS on sale of goods

    5904 shares
    Share 2362 Tweet 1476
  • Are all the due dates of tax audit and Income tax return for FY 2019-20 extended to 31.03.2021 by the bill presented in Lok sabha Dt. 18.09.2020

    4855 shares
    Share 1942 Tweet 1214
  • SFT transaction mentioned in Form 26AS | What does it mean? | Who reports it? | SFT codes transaction type

    4083 shares
    Share 1633 Tweet 1021

Recent Notification

Compliance due dates for June, 2020 | Compliance calendar for June, 2020 | 20+ compliances

Statutory Compliance Calendar for June 2025 | Income tax, GST and various other laws

June 5, 2025
Compliance due dates for June, 2020 | Compliance calendar for June, 2020 | 20+ compliances

Statutory Compliance Calendar for May 2025 | Income tax, GST and various other laws

May 8, 2025

RSS Taxontips

  • Statutory Compliance Calendar for June 2025 | Income tax, GST and various other laws
  • Statutory Compliance Calendar for May 2025 | Income tax, GST and various other laws
  • ITAT Mumbai: Capital Gains on Indian Mutual Funds Not Taxable in India for Non-Residents under DTAA [Case law]
  • Statutory Compliance Calendar for April 2025 | Income tax, GST and various other laws
  • No relief under section 87A for capital gain even after date extended to file revised return for AY 2024-25?
  • Statutory Audit of Cash and Cash Equivalents in Indian Companies [Company Law]
  • Statutory Audit of Trade Receivables in Indian Companies [Company law]
  • Statutory Compliance Calendar for February 2025 | Income tax, GST and various other laws
  • Budget 2025 updates | Income tax and GST updates
  • Assessee receiving message for 80GGC donation for AY 2022-23 from Income tax department

Categories

  • Budget News
  • Business & Other News
  • Case Laws
  • GST news
  • Income Tax News
  • News

Site menu

  • Home
  • Income Tax
    • Income Tax Return
    • Tax Notice/ Personal consultation
    • Compliance Notice
    • Faceless Assessment
  • GST
    • GST Registration
    • GST Consultation
  • News
    • Income Tax News
    • GST news
    • Budget News
    • Business & Other News
  • Q & A
  • About us
  • Contact us
Taxontips

TaxOnTips provides you all tax related solutions in easy way and update you with its regular updates & notifications Visit us for details.
We are based in Jaipur, India

© 2019-2023 Taxontips.com - Tax assistance at your Fingertips

No Result
View All Result
  • Login/Signup
  • Income Tax
    • Income Tax Return
    • Tax Notice/ Personal consultation
    • Compliance Notice
    • Faceless Assessment
  • GST
    • GST registration
    • GST Consultation
  • News
    • Income Tax News
    • GST news
    • Budget News
    • Business & Other News
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Ask an expert/ Talk to an expert
  • Q & A
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use

© 2019-2023 Taxontips.com - Tax assistance at your Fingertips

Book Phone consultation with expert

Sitting home or at your office and don't have time to visit CA's office or don't know where to consult CA. Book your consultation with an expert practicing Chartered Accountant and get your query solved.

Book a phone consultation for 30 minutes with our expert at a very basic cost.

Book consultation

No thanks, I'm not interested!